• Tweet

  • Postal service

  • Share

  • Save

  • Get PDF

  • Buy Copies

  • Print

I withal call up the first performance review I ever got, even though it'southward been nearly 50 years since Ray Moeller, my commencement boss at GE, called me into his role and handed me a document that he called a "performance appraisal."

I read it. It hurt.

On GE's then four-level rating scale, he rated me in the next-to-bottom category. Ray didn't hesitate to signal out all the areas in which I, a newbie trainee on GE's Manufacturing Training Program, had failed to meet his tough expectations. The review ended with Ray stating that, if he had to exercise information technology over, he wouldn't hire Dick Grote.

Every bit negative every bit Ray's appraisal of my performance was, it certainly was accurate. I wasn't doing a good job. I was a recent college grad who hadn't yet made the emotional transition from the soft globe of schoolhouse to the hard world of piece of work. Ray laid it on the line. My response was to immediately shape up and start earning my pay.

I might accept reacted differently if I'd felt the review was inaccurate or unfair. The appraisal would've been far more painful and frustrating if it was off base of operations. How should you reply if your manager gives you a review that seems off the mark — that leaves out a significant accomplishment, or is strongly at variance with your ain evaluation of the quality of your work?

What Is a Operation Appraisement?

First by recognizing that a performance appraisement is non a testable, provable, verifiable document that can exist empirically analyzed and confirmed. It's non the end product of a negotiation between assessor and assessee. A performance appraisal is a formal record of a supervisor's opinion of the quality of an employee'south work.

The important discussion here is opinion. Every bit long as that opinion is based on your manager'southward honest assessment of how well yous have washed the job and is uncolored by personal biases and prejudices, the director has washed the job that is expected of them, and the thing is settled. If the manager and the employee disagree about the opinion, the manager wins.

A primary source of contention betwixt managers and employees over performance appraisals results from the infinite human capacity for self-mirage: Nosotros all think we're better than we really are. Inquiry has consistently demonstrated that individuals are notoriously inaccurate in assessing the quality of their ain performance, and the poorer the performer, the higher (and more inaccurate) the self-cess is likely to exist. So the first step is to accept (every bit I did almost 50 years ago) that the dominate may in fact be right, and that their opinion may indeed exist more accurate than our own.

Your Choices

With that in listen, when deciding whether to challenge a low rating, you lot've generally got three choices:

  1. "My boss may well exist right. I'm disappointed, but I'g going to accept this and make whatever changes are necessary to justify a college rating next year."
  2. "Damn the torpedoes! Full speed alee! This rating is wrong, and I'm ready to do any it takes to go it changed."
  3. "I'm out of here."

Make the choice clearly and so proceed. Hither's a question you lot shouldn't ask: "What do I demand to practice so that you'll rate me every bit 'Exceeds Expectations' next twelvemonth?" Your dominate can't possibly answer that. Y'all're asking them to predict the future. Instead, here's a question you should plan to raise later, during a coaching session or informal conversation, subsequently the dust has settled: "Do you see whatever ways in which I could exist making a more valuable contribution to the team?"

But What If the Manager's Stance Is Wrong?

The easiest operation appraisement issues to get resolved may exist those where the manager's stance is based on factually incorrect information. For example, the director could say "I rated you a iii because your overall customer service score was a 74," when in fact your overall customer score was a 98. This may be a instance where the bad information is of sufficient importance to justify challenging the final result.

Challenging a dominate's appraisal, fifty-fifty in a clear-cutting case of bad information, is e'er a ticklish matter. Be cautious. It's not easy to say to your boss, in whatever words you choose to use, "You're wrong." Don't lose sight of the fact that your boss probably has a significant investment in the appraisal you've decided to claiming. For most managers, writing performance appraisals is a fourth dimension-consuming and emotionally backbreaking activity. Your boss may have had to explicate and justify the rating he gave you in a calibration session with other managers, and a decision to alter your rating may force alterations of other employees' ratings, if your company follows strict distribution guidelines. Your dominate may have reviewed your appraisal in advance with their boss, and having to go back and admit that they got it incorrect the beginning fourth dimension around is awkward at best. Be sure information technology'due south worth it.

You and Your Team Serial

Difficult Conversations

  • 7 Things to Say When a Conversation Turns Negative

Whatever you practise, don't endeavour for immediate resolution. Say something at the finish of the meeting like: "This assessment comes equally a existent surprise to me. I'd like to recollect virtually what yous've said and written, and perhaps accept another chat earlier this becomes official. May I become back to you in a solar day or two?" That lets your boss know that you're concerned about the accuracy of the evaluation without having to endeavor to achieve instant resolution.

Then slumber on information technology. Agree up a figurative mirror to your past year's functioning to see whether your boss'southward assessment might be on target, or at least not then far off the marker that it's worth making a major fuss over.

When you do get back to your boss, do one of ii things. Acknowledge the fact that getting the assessment served as a significant learning experience (or wake-up call), and enquire for their help in understanding how you can make a more valuable contribution in the next 12 months. Or tell your boss that you lot take considered the appraisal carefully, and later on serious idea you believe that an adjustment of the rating is justified. Produce the evidence and the examples that justify your position, keeping in heed that success — a changed rating — is probably unlikely, regardless of your evidence. As 1 boss I know put information technology to a subordinate who was taken aback by a low appraisal rating: "The message you've received from me is exactly what I intended to communicate."

No matter what happens, keep the conversation professional. Your manager is not responsible for your feelings, and your dominate didn't intentionally create the emotional reaction you're experiencing.

One important note: All of this advice assumes that your boss is non incompetent, deliberately lying, or acting with malice. Of course, that'due south not always the case. If your poor performance appraisal results from the fact that your boss truly is incompetent, envious of your success, or dishonest, you lot'll need to make a different calculation virtually your choices. But, fortunately, those cases are rare.

It's understandable to be unhappy, fifty-fifty upset, when you don't agree with your performance review, just proceeding carefully rather than acting rashly is the best approach — and the one most likely to earn you a more than favorable appraisal in the futurity.